![]() ![]() That is however DxO doubles the size of output - making single shot DNG output ~160MB per image. Which is a good thing as I prefer to keep RAW file as long as possible leaving only final adjustments to converted formats. I actually found that DxO can export to DNG, which Lightroom can handle. You can then batch process the whole set (which may take a few minutes if you're using PRIME NR). I'd suggest you pick one representative frame, adjust it to your taste in PhotoLab (including closely examining the output file), then paste the settings to the rest of the set. ![]() So you need to do your initial processing of the RAW files in PhotoLab, then export them all as TIFFs/JPEGs to LR or PS. In fact, DxO's PRIME NR is only available with RAW files, so you can't use it on TIFF/JPEG files. If you want to take advantage of DxO's strengths, you have to use it to process unedited RAW files. So i not sure what's the proper workflow with DxO should be considering their poor support for HDR-merged DNG files?ĭxO only handles DNG files from cameras it supports, and I don't suppose that includes processed/merged files from another program. Which means i can either use DxO's capabilities if I convert resulted panorama to TIF (or JPG?) OR if I play with DxO before I even try to merge RAW files into single HDR DNG with Lightroom. So neither DNG's generated by 3-frames-to-one-DNG nor all-frames-to-full-panorama-DNG are supported. ![]() However - i found to my surprise that DxO does not support DNG files generated by Adobe Lightroom contrary to their claims. I bought DxO Photolab 2 because I've heard about it's great noise reduction and de-hazing capability. Latter can be stitched together via Adobe Lightroom: Photomerge -> Panorama or Photomerge -> HDR Panorama. I shoot panoramas - and mostly in a way of 3 bracketed shots per frame. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |